Review: Imaginary Friend
/
3 stars. UMMMMM WOW. Okay. Was NOT expecting that. This is going to be a weird review to write, because Imaginary Friend was a weird book to read. Full disclosure: I have not read Perks of Being a Wallflower - it’s decidedly NOT my cup of tea (I did see the movie and am aware of the basic themes). However, I was really excited to sink my teeth into a long horror story said to resemble King, my king.
This is going to be an epic fail of a summary, but I'll try. Essentially, a young boy, Christopher, moves to a new town with his mother Kate. He is lured into the creepy woods nearby and disappears for six days. When he returns, he's different: school is easier, his financial situation improves, he can read more easily, and he has a new "friend" - an invisible voice persuading him to return to the woods and build a treehouse. He does, and .... very weird shit happens.
Here’s what I liked about this: it’s a pageturner. It has multiple distinct characters. It’s detailed and well-written and has some GREAT villains. It explores religious mythology in an interesting way (more on that below). The plot doesn’t always involve kids versus adults (“you don’t believe me!” “well, you’re grounded” for forty chapters is always fun).
Here’s what I didn’t like: it’s way too long. It’s preachy. The ages of the kids don't quite match up with their characters, even before they become geniuses. It isn’t quite scary enough for me. It becomes VERY abstract and even a bit confusing. It’s cartoonish, which distracts from what could’ve been super genuinely disturbing. And it tries way too hard.
On the religious aspect of this book: I didn’t realize there would be one when I picked it up. As an atheist, I don’t always enjoy books that paint such certain and steadfast messages about faith. But, and this is going to sound a bit snooty, I do find it very interesting to read the Bible, and learn religious lore (of all religions) from a historical standpoint. Or from a literary standpoint. I don’t know what the author intended, but I’ll just consider this (I’m trying to be as vague as possible to avoid spoilers!) an exploration of a religious story many of us know and subscribe to, rather than a sermon. Otherwise, I wouldn't be the right audience, and I’d be annoyed.
Imaginary Friend reminds me much more of Joe Hill than Stephen King. Just because it’s long and detailed and plays with many characters just makes it a little Kingish, not totally King! I’m not surprised by the comparison but definitely expected more. I did love the 'Salem's Lot vibe featuring a town entirely corrupted. The suburbs are always full of secrets...
Anyhoo, I don't think I can quite recommend this, because it's such a big effort for such a weird payoff. But it kept me pretty entertained for a few days.