Review: From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler

Programming note: I took a little forced hiatus from reading due to some major life and health reasons, which really, really impacted my reading habits. More soon, when I can stomach it. Feeling rusty but let's get to it.

5 stars. In this beloved 1967 children's story/urban fairy tale, Claudia Kincaid and her younger brother Jamie run away and settle in at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. Resourceful and delighted by their freedom, they quickly find ways to stay clean, fed, and "educated," for the most part. And even better - helpful, to the Met, as they try to help prove that its latest acquisition is actually a piece of work by Michaelangelo. 

Can you imagine this story had it been written today? In modern times? There's no way - it's an interesting thought exercise that only leads to depressing outcomes. Despite feeling very classic, and more classic every time I read it, many of the lessons and feelings it evokes still resonate. It's funny, too, looking back on this and wondering if it even partially inspired an interest in art history and museums. I didn't even know how to pronounce Michaelangelo when I read it the first time, but maybe it sparked something that still burns decades later.

It's really nice to see the kids' competence and intelligence on full display. They each have slightly different approaches to problem-solving, but they do fit together nicely. They are so witty, and smart, and capable, and driven by wonderfully relatable motives. I know this isn't considered a perfect piece of writing - complaints about the narrator's role, for example, and the plot structure - but I didn't spend a single minute considering any of that while reading. I was way too entertained.

Looking for more of this energy in 2024.

From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: How to Disappear Completely and Never Be Found

5 stars. Okay. Thinking through things, I guess it's fair to say that the end of 2022 got really challenging and I really lost my mojo, so to speak. I'm exhausted. My brain is still kind of in recovery mode, operating in fits and starts and not at all at full capacity. I'm still reading Wounds and loving it, but in a moment of sheer panic I picked up this throwback and absolutely loved it.

For many recent years, this book flew around in the back of my mind, but I couldn't remember any specific details. Finally I Googled something like "young adult novel comic book uncle rat margaret" and the internet delivered. I bought a second-hand copy from a library immediately. Between Top Gun and Willow and National Treasure, there's a lot of delicious nostalgia to go around, and this was no different.

This is kind of a classic coming-of-age story about a girl named Margaret and her younger sister Sophie. After their father died in a horrible drowning tragedy a few years ago, their mother sunk into a deep depression (depicted fairly and sensitively) and the family exists on a sort of quiet, day-to-day survival basis. Then, one day, their mother piles them in the car and they drive to an old mansion in the middle of nowhere and stick a for sale sign on the lawn. Margaret and Sophie are spooked and curious and decide to follow the clues to find answers about the house and their dad, and end up making a few friends along the way.

Like I said, I loved it. It's vivid and funny and creative and fresh, with wonderful characters and unpredictable plotlines. I think it stuck with me for all these years because it's really spooky, too. It obviously tickled my interests back then as it would now. I adored the ending. The book contains a few comic book illustrations and they are delightful. Little Kelly had excellent taste.

How to Disappear Completely and Never Be Found on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Harriet the Spy

4 stars. Oops, seemed to have stumbled onto something controversial. What book published in the 60s isn't going to attract some lightning, though? A couple of things: 1) I entered this having remembered reading and enjoying it as a kid but quickly discovered that every memory of the book was completely washed away by memories of the movie adaptation instead... SO, I read this - basically - fresh. 2) I actually understand all of the arguments here. I would just say that there's a difference between a "bad book" and a "book you don't like." Finally, 3) sometimes a book can have wonderful aspects and also not-so-wonderful aspects. Like maybe every book ever. Like maybe every person ever.

Published in 1964, Harriet the Spy is about Harriet M. Welsch, a precocious, intelligent, headstrong 11-year-old determined to be a spy or a writer or some combo of both. She records her observations and thoughts - unfiltered - in a notebook. It's really a coming-of-age story as we witness Harriet experience intense change, face consequences for her actions, and learn several lessons about how messy life can be.

I have to say I really, really enjoyed it. It's hilarious, clever and refreshing... a couple of reviewers have noted that Harriet was a hugely different type of female protagonist for the 60s. She still feels different today, in a good way. No, Harriet isn't sweet, docile, obedient, or filtered in any way. She's stubborn, loud, nosy, confused, extremely critical and judgmental - kind of a toxic friend, too. The ending didn't sit totally right with me, but I think it was the right ending for her, if that makes sense.

I don't think this book - or any book - should be taken as a literal guide for one's behavior. Of course redemption arcs have their time and place, but I think kids are smart enough to be able to distinguish between when a hero isn't acting heroic, no? And smart enough to navigate action and consequence when it isn't perhaps as straightforward? As it isn't typically IRL? Who knows. Not me. But I do know that reading this book was an endlessly entertaining experience that I'd recommend to kids and adults alike. It's a classic for a reason.

Harriet the Spy on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Regarding the Fountain

It's time for a THROWBACK THURSDAY! I'm not a very, shall we say, sentimental person, but because the most vivid and joyful memories of my childhood involve books, I sometimes feel a strong pull toward my old favorites. I've dabbled in fun re-reads before, but I'd like to make it more of a priority: books shouldn't just sit on the shelf! They should be enjoyed! So here we are. Throwback Thursday.

5 stars. All the stars. This is the cleanse I needed. If you have an hour to spare and want to escape from all the gloom, doom, anxiety, panic, chaos, and office politics, start here. I read this as a kid - many times - and it's just as charming and funny as I remembered. The last page almost made me fucking emotional. I think it hit me like that because the Klise World is so beautiful, lovely, and warm, full of low stakes and happy endings and tangible justice - so different from reality. I'm ready to jump into these pages and never leave.

The water fountain in Dry Creek Middle School has sprung a leak! Principal Walter (not Wally) Russ reaches out to Florence Waters, world-renowned fountain architect and globetrotting adventuress, for an estimate on a new one. But there's trouble afoot in Dry Creek, and some "concerned" citizens are insisting that a new fountain isn't needed. Thankfully Sam N.'s Fifth Grade class is on the case, and they are determined to figure out why exactly there's so much controversy regarding the fountain!

Ahh, it's really a Kelly Classic. Epistolary, clever, inspiring. And it's got a downright heartwarming message. Florence is my hero and the kids are so creative and cute. The *mystery* is incredibly fun and the illustrations are absolutely perfect - right down to the facial expressions and witty details. I just cannot say enough about what a good read this is, for all ages. For anyone in need of a boost. Cheers to art, generosity, and living life to the fullest in a fun, flowing fountain!

Regarding the Fountain on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (HP #1)

Feeeeeeeelings. Like many of you, I grew up with Harry. These books were read aloud to me as a young person and I revisited them many, many, many times after. I was there for the midnight releases, the casting announcements, the movie premieres, the fanfiction, the websites, the art, the wonder, the excitement, the tinkering, the raised eyebrows, the broken promises, the disappointments, and then the ultimate betrayal. The ongoing betrayal. That sounds ridiculously dramatic, but let's not be vague about it: the creator of this generation-defining series expressed narrow-minded, transphobic beliefs and then doubled down. It's a painful story and it's one that I can't really seem to look away from, because it's interesting and horrible and bruising.

I am not trans, and so I cannot even begin to understand the depths of personal and public trauma she has caused for some and continues to cause. But I still feel the need to process it ... to sort through the *gestures* big mess of it all. I really started considering a re-read when I hit the Pandemic Wall, like so many of us have in the past few weeks, under a few conditions: (1) I'll read my physical copies to avoid leaving a data footprint that could benefit her in any capacity (lol), (2) I'll read with a more critical eye and try to learn from it and (3) I'll let myself enjoy the books if it feels right. There are a lot of articles and think pieces about reconciling art with its artist (or separating it), and I'm going to lean on them if things get weird. They will.

---

Reviewing would be pretty much impossible, so here are my notes:

• Almost right away - Chapter 1 - there are clues. Not too many, and not enough to make things confusing, but the level of planning JKR did is astounding.

• The tone here is so playful and clever and humorous. I know the books get darker because the wizarding world gets darker (and the characters get older), but I'm going to miss the easy, readable flow she uses in Book 1.

• The characters are distinct and arrive fully fleshed out, which I find to be rare in fiction, when every individual comes from the same mind.

• I wonder how influential the editing process was on this before it was published, and how little it influenced the later books. At some point it must've reached a point where the publishers were like, okay, just let her do her thing, which probably led to the extreme bloat toward the end of the series. I wonder what Harry Potter as a whole would've looked like had every book been packaged as neatly as this one.

• I know this resonates with everyone but reading about how a letter could arrive one day offering you a literal escape from your horrible life into a magical one is so vivid and hopeful I could almost taste it.

• Things that surprised me: there are very few spells mentioned or described. Some, but not nearly as many as I remembered or expected. Also, the early appearance of the centaurs.

• How much could have or would have been different had Dumbledore just been honest with Harry from the beginning?

• This book - the imagery, the dialogue, the faces of the characters - is so, so, so intertwined with the first movie. They are inseparable in my brain, partly because I think the first movie matches so closely what I saw in my head reading it for the first time. It's a shame movies 3-8 don't subscribe to that tone for consistency's sake.

• Ultimately, there's no denying that this gave to me and many others an incredible doorway. I really enjoyed re-reading. There's plenty of heart, soul and magic to be found in these wonderful books, despite the actions of their author.

Note: I won’t be including any links to purchase on HP-related posts.

Review: A Deadly Education (The Scholomance #1)

2 stars. Hahahahaha. Okay. An education INDEED. I am honestly so sorry - I tried to like this. I really did. I had heard that it's supposed to be like a sort of warped HP from Hermione's perspective with a lot more violence and death. And it was, I guess. But this damn book seemed designed for me to hate - full of a bunch of personal pet peeves that I just couldn’t get over.

But first: The Controversy. I did some research before starting to read, trying to get some clarity on the accusations and the reasons why it's being called racist. And I think I understand. Some of the language choices in this book come across as clinical and forced and ignorant. I'll be the first to cry "depiction is not endorsement," (or in other words - the character thinks this, but does the author?) but to be honest I don't even feel like I should weigh in. Please know that I tried to read this with a critical eye and an open mind and a determination to use it as an opportunity to learn - if not on what to do, at the very least on what not to do. I see why readers were offended. I also see why the author made the choices she did.

Okay. A Deadly Education is about a teenage girl named Galadriel, a student at a violent and terrifying magical school called the Scholomance. The Scholomance houses and teaches magic-wiedling young people how to hone their craft while being threatened - constantly and to the death - by evil monsters lurking in the walls and the dark corners of their home. El gets a bit tangled up socially with the school hero, Orion Lake, and has to navigate the typical minefields of being an adolescent (puberty, cafeteria politics, academic competition) while, well, trying to stay alive in an environment that's trying to kill her before graduation.

Oh, man. Okay. Again, I apologize. I really did try. But when I hit 86% and I found myself skimming?! Forget about it. I can tell Naomi Novik really, really loved her own idea and dug deep. I get it. But I feel like I have to catalogue why this didn't work for me, even though it feels kind of gross to do so, because I just know there are readers out there who have the same cringe triggers as me (if they aren't put off by all the well-deserved dramatic conversation surrounding this book in the first place):

First - the British slang and mannerisms. It's a bit difficult to explain, but they didn't fit right here. Every time I came across one ("git" "scanner" etc.) they seemed cute-in-a-bad-way, out-of-place, and forced.

Second - Orion. I am on a lifelong quest to find a well-written teenage boy - or at the very least, a teenage boy character that resembles even just one of the teenage boys I have actually known in real life. My quest continues.

Third - the use of the name Galadriel and the LOTR references. This is a personal thing for me (I told you these were pet peeves!). LOTR is so sacred to me it honestly felt ... weird. When El started randomly referencing her name and the movies and ... something about this just seemed really off. Like a wink or a nod that was TOTALLY unnecessary.

Fourth - the exposition! The info dumping! ARGHHHH! I initially thought the first chapter would be the heaviest - full of explanations and terminology and rule-dropping - but NO! This type of writing - "educating the reader as we go along with the story" - continues for the rest of the damn. book. I'm talking about a new character/concept (the valedictorian thing) in the FINAL PAGES OF THE BOOK. The action itself, if we removed all the lecturing, would probably be about five pages long. I'M SERIOUS. If you are in the mood to be TAUGHT a CONCEPT, rather than READ a STORY, this book might be for you.

Fifth - wayyyy too much emphasis on cafeteria tables. I went through that in middle school and I have no desire to enter into any intense consideration of that sort of thing ever, ever, ever again in my life.

I will say: it's a fascinating, complex concept. And Naomi Novik does a great job of subverting tropes and creating delightfully stubborn, fierce, powerful female protagonist. El's overall feistiness was truly appreciated. I'll give her that. I also think more books - especially YA books - should so blatantly explore and address issues like inequality and economic status quo. I know it's a hot topic word, but there is a lot about privilege and its advantages.

I'm bummed though, dude. I really am. It was just a 2-star read for me.

A Deadly Education on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: The Queen of Nothing (The Folk of the Air #3)

3 stars. I KNOW! KILL ME! But before I go further I feel like I should expand on a couple of things: first, I don't like endings. I naturally dislike them. I don't know why! I just prefer beginnings. Second, I don't like it when sexual tension is ... well ... resolved. There's a reason I started hating The Office when Pam and Jim got together. I like banter! I like angst! I'll take a cruel bully over a lovesick puppy! (What is wrong with me?) So I'm giving this a lower rating because honestly - it would have never been my favorite to begin with. It's a me thing, not an author thing, not a story thing, not a writing thing.

That being said, more objectively, this may have been a little weaker by way of plot. I missed the fierce excitement of the first two, and I missed the nastiness. There wasn't enough bite. I loved the icky cliffhanger of the second book - actually, I'm not going to summarize because I want to avoid spoilers - but I was hoping that it would take a bit more rock'n'roll for Jude to get herself out of that one. Cardan's transformation over these three books seemed a little too smooth for my taste. And the ending?! Would you like some crackers with that cheese?!

Otherwise, WOW. What an accomplishment! This series is awesome, compelling, addictive, well-written, and FUN. Holly Black wrapped things up super suitably, throwing out credible and interesting character developments like confetti. I really, really loved the way Jude learned her lessons without sacrificing the core of her identity. I can see why so many readers connected with her and stand behind her - in fact, I can see why this series inspired such a passionate fanbase (which says a lot, coming from someone who is mostly disgruntled about fanbases).

Worth the time and the effort and then some. And I managed to finish another series just before the end of the year, per my mostly-failed reading challenge. Go me.

The Queen of Nothing on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: The Wicked King (The Folk of the Air #2)

4 stars. Delighted to find that Holly Black really settled into the storytelling in this book. It's more sophisticated than the first and brilliant as a trilogy bridge. There's more self-awareness from the writing and from the characters themselves. Happy to say I really enjoyed my return visit to Trope City. There's more faerie politics! More intrigue! More romance! More murder! So fun.

The Wicked King picks up where The Cruel Prince left off, with Cardan on the throne and Jude by his side as his "counselor," aka, ruler of the kingdom (not a spoiler). But, like, there's so much trouble afoot - family drama, and upcoming wedding, threats from old villains seeking revenge, and dangerous alliances that could lead to outright war.

One of my favorite aspects of Jude's character and her journey is her struggle with herself - her regret, her guilt, her awareness of her own poor decision-making - the arrogant and power-hungry aspects of her identity. In fact, I loved the level of self-loathing among a few of the characters. I also really appreciate her relationship with her guardian/second father, which is complicated and messy and blurs the line between love and hate (it's a thing, okay?! And no, I don't mean "hate-to-love," lol).

Also worth noting: Jude's appearance is barely described. It's not how she measures her self-worth, nor how she is judged. These books are unapologetic about things like sex and nudity - focusing less on moral judgments and more on advancement of character. It's a fascinating way to write YA and is clearly done well here, so I hope there's more books like this to come!

Immersive and captivating don't even begin to cover it. More sophisticated than the first and just as entertaining.

The Wicked King on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: The Cruel Prince (The Folk of the Air #1)

4 stars. Okay, I can see why readers love this series. I haven't picked up a YA fantasy in ages and I have to say, the dress (described in exquisite detail, of course, typically pastel or ombre with delicate embellishments that compliment my eyes), still fits. I really enjoyed it. Perfect? Far from it. But it read nicely and was utterly compelling from a sugary, just-one-more-bite kind of way.

For those of you on Goodreads who have miraculously missed the prevalence of this book, The Cruel Prince is about a mortal girl named Jude, who, after the brutal murder of her parents (not a spoiler), is raised in the land of faeries. Her guardian is a war general for the king, who plans to abdicate and crown one of his sons. As the coronation approaches, Jude gets super tangled in faerie court politics in the messy way only feisty YA protagonists can, which is to say, pick up your sword and outsmart them all, girl. Spill some blood in between the hot kissing.

I really enjoyed the fact that Holly Black makes this a modern story while sticking - for the most part - to the original faerie canon. There's so much lore to revel in, like bargains and truth-telling and magic and changelings and revelry and enchantment and twinkly lights and sweet wine and dangerous fruit. I loved that aspect and hope she leans into it in future books.

Otherwise, well, listen. It's a trope city up in here. But I still loved it. This book reminded me of a sensation I used to feel while reading - something that's largely lost as an adult, or maybe because of the books I read these days. And that sensation is possibility. These are the types of books that are arguably ridiculous, obvious fantasy. But you can't help but feel a little inkling of hope that maybe somewhere, for someone, it's real.

I'll take one Cardan to go, please.

The Cruel Prince on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads

Review: Howl's Moving Castle

5 stars. I am completely unclear as to how this managed to escape my attention earlier in life - but I’m actually quite glad I waited till adulthood to read it. It’s obviously an instant fairy tale classic, full of unconventional adventures, silly characters, fantastic settings, flawed magic, and deep wit, and I’ve fallen in love with the completely unique nature of the story. Especially thanks to recent events, J.K. Rowling can walk off a cliff as far as I’m concerned. This is the real deal. This is wonderfully whimsical and fun.

Howl’s Moving Castle is about a young, demure girl named Sophie who, through a series of unfortunate misunderstandings, is cursed by the Witch of the Waste to become an old woman. Embracing her new identity and leaving her old life behind, Sophie finds shelter in a moving castle inhabited by the wizard Howl, his apprentice Michael, and a feisty fire demon named Calcifer. Together this team of misfits fight battles small (the dust and spiders MUST go!) and large (the Witch of the Waste’s curse looms over them all) to reach a happy ending full of surprises. 

Things I loved: Calcifer - hands down, favorite character. I also loved the way things just happen, without rhyme or reason or explanation. There’s a sort of “just go with it” vibe that I found very refreshing. Also: the unexpected twists and turns that had even me guessing. The fact that the heroes and heroines of this story are flawed and imperfect and guaranteed to make many mistakes along the way. The way our ragtag group of friends bicker and banter as a way to show each other love and support. The sheer creativity of it all. Wales Rugby! Flowers! Hats! Drying Power!

Normally this is where I’d list the things I didn’t love, but for once, I have no complaints. Interestingly, the writing style takes some getting used to - it’s a bit … well, genius/unique? That’s the best I can come up with. I can’t wait to read it again, though, because I want to dig for hidden details and clues. I want to carve away the layers and get beyond the first blushes of love and dive deep into what makes this story tick. I know there’s buried treasure within these words. 

This is the type of book best enjoyed with a swish, savor, and swallow. I’d consider it foundational fantasy and a must-read for kids and adults alike. I want to jump into this world and never come back. I’m currently in a cabin with no Wi-Fi, or I’d be doing research on what is sure to be a very passionate fandom right now. I believe I saw the adaptation once many, many years ago and look forward to watching it again, even if it washes away my own interpretations. The soul of this story is what’s important.

Quick note: the edition I read included an interview with the author in the back, and she said that many, many, many young female readers have declared a desire to marry Howl. Um, what. No. Howl is a nightmare. Howl is my WORST nightmare. Howl has a heart of gold but he’s a DIVA KING! Just, no. He’s so extra. (Still, I’m pretty sure he and Sophie would have super hot make-up sex.)

Howl’s Moving Castle on: Amazon | Bookshop.org | Goodreads